V Subrahmanian, Friday, June 6, 2014 3:59 pm

The muNDakopaniShat – Part 6

Part 6

What is the nature of this created world, otherwise known as ‘sams?ra’, the analysis of which leads to deep dispassion?  To answer this Sri Shankaracharya gives a lengthy description thereof.

The subtlest form of the world is the ‘avyakta’ which is the unmanifest, the seed form of the manifest world.  And the grossest form is the unmoving objects in creation, in the manifest world.  This has the name-form dual as its unmanifest and manifest form.  Just as the seed-sprout pair, the manifest and the unmanifest are related to each other as the causal factor.  The manifest world, through the action, karma, of the human inhabitants, will decide the nature of the unmanifest world which is the seed for the next creation.  Also, the residual karma of the beings in general too adds to this input. The world is full of infinite situations leading to immense miseries.  These are devoid of any essence just like the pith of a banana shoot.  The world experience is akin to an illusion, mirage water, phantom city, a dream, bubbles and surf, meeting destruction every moment.  A discriminating one sets this world aside realizing that all  actions  are only founded on the defects that are ignorance and desire that are fuelled by dharma and adharma. The mantra says ‘a br?hma?a renounces’.  This is because, it is only a br?hma?a that is most suited to renounce all actions and engage in the pursuit of Self-knowledge full time.  What does such an aspirant do after examining the world and arriving at the conclusion that anything in the world is a product of action?  He gains deep dispassion.  The form of such a dispassion is being stated:

‘In this world there is nothing that is not a product of action.  Everything is therefore evanescent; nothing is permanent.  All action, therefore, is only a means for evanescence.  These are the four effects of action:
1. Origination,
2. attainment,
3. purification and
4. transformation. 

Apart from these, there is no other category that is a product of action.  I am desirous of that which is eternal, beyond death and fear, is unchanging, unmoving and firm and not something other than /opposite to this. Therefore what indeed is attained by action that is attended with tiresome effort that is only a means to misery?’   In this manner such a rare aspirant develops dispassion and sets his eye on that which is fearless, auspicious, blissful and eternal. With a view to realize that Supreme Truth, he necessarily approaches an ?c?rya, Teacher, who is endowed with the six-fold disciplinary personality. The Veda emphasizing ‘gurum eva’, that one should mandatorily approach a Teacher, is to caution that even if one is proficient in all disciplines one ought not to engage in Self-enquiry, all by oneself without the most valuable aid of the Teacher.  

There is a formal manner in which the aspirant approaches the ?c?rya.  He carries a bundle of sacrificial faggots.  What is the kind of ?c?rya that he approaches? He has to be well learned in the scripture and also be established in the direct knowledge/realization of Brahman, to the exclusion of all other works.  The word ‘ni??h?’ conveys the meaning that he is preoccupied with being immersed in Brahman, just as a man who predominantly practices japa is called a ‘japani??ha’ or someone given to strict austerities is alled ‘taponi??ha.’   The specification is because those engaged, engrossed, in action, cannot give themselves to uninterrupted establishment in Brahman experience.  The aspirant has to approach such a Guru and pose questions about the ?tman.

Mantra 1.1.13

????? ? ??????????????? ????-

????????????????? ?????????? ?

????????? ?????? ??? ?????

??????? ??? ???????? ?????????????? ? ?? ?

????? to him ? ???????? that Teacher ????????  ?????? well approached ??????????????? serene ?????????? self-controlled ??? by which ?????? the Imperishable  ?????? puru?a ??? knows ????? Truth ??????? teach ??? that ???????? as It is ?????????????? Brahman-knowledge

To that pupil who has duly approached him, whose mind is completely serene and whose senses are controlled, the wise teacher should indeed rightly impart the Knowledge of Brahman, through which one knows the immutable and the true Puru?a. 

The aspirant’s qualities/qualifications are specified so as to show that the Highest Teaching can/should be imparted only to the right candidate who has approached the Teacher in the prescribed manner.  He has to be of a serene and composed mind, free of arrogance and the like.  Keeping under check the sense organs and mind too is an indispensable trait in an aspirant of Ved?nta.  Dispassion with regard to everything in the world is to be present in him.   To such an aspirant, the Teacher who is a knower of Brahman, has to impart that supreme vidy? which will reveal the  Upani?adic Puru?a, Brahman, as It is.  Why is a special vidy? required for this? It is because this Puru?a is not known through any other means of knowledge.  It is devoid of form, etc. and hence not an object of perception.  It is all-pervading, infinite and available as resting in the individual soul.  It is the immutable Self, imperishable.  By saying so the Upani?ad is placing a lofty duty on the Self-realized Master that he has to rescue the right aspirant from the trammels of sams?ra,  the ocean of ignorance.

Now starts the first section of the second chapter of the Mu??akopani?at.

The effect of the aparavidy?, lower knowledge, has been stated so far in its entirety.  And that is called ‘sams?ra’ which originates from the Imperishable, ak?ara, Brahman, and resolves into It.  As it was stated in the very beginning, the knowledge of that when had results in the attainment of knowledge of everything, which is Brahman, has to be stated and with this as the subject matter commences the following part.

Mantra 2.1.1

??????????? ??? ??????????????????????????????

??????? ????????? ?????? ?

????????????????? ????? ?????

?????????? ???? ??????????? ? ? ?  

??? ???? this is the ????? truth ??? just as ?????????? from blazing ??????? fire ????????????? sparks ??????? in thousands ????????? issue forth ?????? of the nature of fire ??? so too ???????? from the Imperishable  ??????? various ????? O, good looking one, ????? beings ?????????? are born ????  ? and there ?? alone ???????? they return to

This is the Truth: As from a blazing fire, sparks essentially akin to it fly forth by the thousand, so also, my good friend, do various beings come forth from the imperishable Brahman and unto Him again return. 

That which is the subject matter of the lower vidy?, characterized by the effect of action, is real, relatively. This, Brahman, however, the subject matter of the higher vidy?, is the absolutely real.  This is the Real, that which exists as It is, the object of knowledge, and the other is the subject matter of ignorance, avidy?, and therefore, unreal.  So, here we have two categories: That which is characterized by avidy?, and is unreal, or relatively real.  And that which is really real, verily the matter of vidy?.  We can say that these two are a-brahman and Brahman.  Since Brahman is extremely beyond the ken of the senses, with a view to help us get an understanding thereof the Upani?ad offers an analogy.     

Just as from a blazing fire innumerable sparks that are no different from the fire scatter forth in different directions, so too from the Imperishable, Ak?ara, Brahman, different types of beings, j?va-s, owing to identification with different types of body-mind complexes, issue forth.  Are the j?va-s really different from each other? No. Just as from one impartite space different adjuncts like pot-spaces, attain different identities like pot, etc. so too owing to identification with differently named body-mind complexes, the sentient beings appear to be different from each other.  Just as space is the common factor in all the pot-spaced adjuncts, so too the Pure Consciousness, the Imperishable  Ak?aram, is the underlying truth of the various beings.  Just as the various space-adjuncts dissolve into one infinite space upon the destruction of the adjuncts, so too, upon the destruction of the body-mind complexes what remains will be one Pure Consciousness without no trace of the different  j?va-s.  Thus we arrive at the conclusion that just as the origination and dissolution of the different space-bodies is caused by the different adjuncts, so too the origination and destruction of the j?va-s is due to the different adjuncts that are the body-mind complexes.  

The Upani?ad goes on to present the Imperishable, Ak?aram, as the One that is greater/higher than the unmanifest, avy?k?ta, which is itself great/high compared t o the manifest effects for which it (the unmanifest) is the seed. Brahman, free of all such adjuncts, is presented by the Upani?ad for the purpose of getting the correct understanding thereof leading to liberating knowledge. This is just as the infinite space can be conceived of by negating the entirety of forms that the space is admitted to be accommodating.  This process of negating is taught by the Veda as ‘neti neti’ etc.

Part 1, Part 5, Part 7

Warning: Use of undefined constant php - assumed 'php' (this will throw an Error in a future version of PHP) in /homepages/26/d757526286/htdocs/ADVAITAACADEMY/wp-content/themes/advaita/single.php on line 102

Recent articles